Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Noel"
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 9:56 am
Noel Canning — a run-of-the-mill workplace dispute that had mushroomed into a deep and fundamental inquiry into how best to interpret the Constitution. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The regulatory approach to such compounds can be based on the identification of a No-Observed Effect Level (NOEL) and use of uncertainty factors (see ICH Q3C(R5), Ref. 7) to calculate a permissible daily exposure (PDE) when data are available. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania ; Gamble v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Frank V. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
