Search for: "People v. Stewart"
Results 41 - 60
of 898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Canada On 20 March 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ordered the plaintiffs to pay the reasonable costs of the defendant on a full indemnity basis, in the case of Mawhinney v Stewart, 2023 BCSC 419, [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:31 am
For example, in her forceful dissent in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
Partway through oral argument before the Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
”Four years later, in Gregg v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm
One thing that AI is creepily good at is faking people's voices. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
Stewart, reviewing Lex Pacificatoria, Jus Post Bellum, or Just “Good Practice”? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am
And to give people some guidance or give people some hope that that might happen. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
The Human Rights Commissioner lodged a submission to the UN Committee Against Torture in November 2022, making 44 recommendations regarding the treatment of children in youth detention centres, First Nations people, those with a disability, and LGBTIQ+ people. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
Stewart, 827 N.W.2d 128, 153-54 (Iowa 2013); Bird v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
