Search for: "People of the State of New York v Monroe" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm by Jeremy Saland
As the court sees no way to distinguish the relative strength of these inferences, the court finds that they are of equal and opposite strength (see, e.g., People v Dudley, 53 Misc 3d 679 [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]; People v Spry, 50 Misc 3d 1208 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]); but see, People v Monroe-Francis, 51 Misc 3d 1202 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016];… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:54 am by Shelby Bruce (US)
The court found that the physical similarity between the lookalikes and the Fat Boys rap group, constituted a cause of action under New York law. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:54 am by Shelby Bruce (US)
The court found that the physical similarity between the lookalikes and the Fat Boys rap group, constituted a cause of action under New York law. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
New York Times, April 16, 1873 In 1874, the White League staged an uprising in New Orleans (then the capital of Louisiana) to seize control of the state government. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" The court also noted that they introduced the selective silence before the grand jury testimony.Therefore, the rule in New York is that "Evidence of a defendant's selective silence therefore generally may not be used by the People during their case-in-chief and may be used only as 'a device for impeachment' of a defendant's trial testimony in limited and unusual circumstances". [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 Remember that if you are in a situation in which federal law is bad, argue that New York State's constitution is more protective of rights and make a state constitutional argument.The good news is that, as pointed out by Jamie Hobbs of the Monroe County Public Defender's Office, the current New York state case law is the opposite from the decision reached by the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Rankin, a case in which Judge John DeMarco presided in Monroe County Court, Rochester New York, the question of whether an indigent defendant had the same right to counsel as one who could afford to retain was answered. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After residing in a trailer park in Sodus, New York, they bought a house and settled in Williamson, New York. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and New York's Court of Appeals have enumerated these decisions that are so fundamental that they can only be made by the defendant, not his attorney. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]