Search for: "People v Armstrong" Results 41 - 60 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2021, 8:46 pm
 In our view, the term "reasonable care" as used in the policy is ambiguous inasmuch as it is susceptible of at least two reasonable interpretations, at least one of which supports plaintiffs' contention that they exercised reasonable care, and this ambiguity was not resolved by extrinsic evidence (see generally Armstrong v United Frontier Mut. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] The reference to Justices Armstrong and Kelly were in R. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
Over the new year, Congress overrode President Trump’s veto to enact into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal 2021—an annual piece of legislation that lays out the budget, expenditures and policies of the Pentagon for the upcoming year. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xxiv] More than 11,000 people contributed over $150 million to the organization. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm by David Oscar Markus
In 1979, Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong published the groundbreaking book, The Brethren. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
  And so, even as a great many peoples worship the idea of the formless, they cannot help but provide manifestations of that formlessness as a bridge (and then ultimately as the thing itself). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Armstrong v McIntosh (No.4) [2020] WASC 31– a defamation case heard in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. [read post]