Search for: "People v Jr."
Results 41 - 60
of 2,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
"] From B.B. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
You can reach her by e-mail at reva.siegel@yale.edu.Mary Ziegler is Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:55 am
Everitt, Cold Front v. 38Why not both? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:44 am
” “Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses of the Southern District of New York recently addressed this issue in Bonde v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
That is the legacy of the brilliant Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Although the Taft Court continued to reflect traditional norms and showed “high rates of uniformity” in its decisions,[3] after 1925 its unanimity rates began to “slide”(617), a slide that would quicken in the 1930s and 1940s and that later Courts would often accelerate but seldom reverse.[4] The Taft Court’s legendary dissenters–Justices Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Louis D. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., by contrast, was a legal positivist. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
“ — Billy Frank Jr., Where the Salmon Run: The Life and Legacy of Billy Frank Jr. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
He has had a bumpy ride of late, what with the leak of the decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:35 am
” J.D. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]