Search for: "People v Jr." Results 41 - 60 of 2,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
You can reach her by e-mail at reva.siegel@yale.edu.Mary Ziegler is Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is the legacy of the brilliant Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Although the Taft Court continued to reflect traditional norms and showed “high rates of uniformity” in its decisions,[3] after 1925 its unanimity rates began to “slide”(617), a slide that would quicken in the 1930s and 1940s and that later Courts would often accelerate but seldom reverse.[4] The Taft Court’s legendary dissenters–Justices Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Louis D. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
“ — Billy Frank Jr., Where the Salmon Run: The Life and Legacy of Billy Frank Jr. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
He has had a bumpy ride of late, what with the leak of the decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]