Search for: "People v Pataki"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Pataki, 165 F.Supp. 2d 266, 300 (N.D.N.Y. 2001) (testimony on state’s purchase of tribal land); Denson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Pataki (2008); and Tuck-It-Away v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:43 pm
Pataki in 2005. *** Judge Cherished Opinions Standing Up for the ‘Little Guy’ In In re Golden, 56 AD3d 1109 (2008), Justice Cardona concluded that both common law and state Human Services Law permit transgendered individuals to legally assume a new name to reflect their new identification; in People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
Pataki, 449 F. 3d 305 (2006). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:44 pm
Pataki. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:15 am
See People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
Sing Sing in New York.The place where in People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:33 am
Pataki, 969 F. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
How tough, however, has now been answered in the First Department's decision in People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
Pataki (2d Cir. 2002); I think that has to be right, but the issue is not clearly settled. 5. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
Godfrey v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The two cases before the court were Godfrey v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
II. [*3] The Governor has raised a threshold question as to Senator Skelos's standing to sue in light of the stringent criteria for legislator standing that we adopted in Silver v Pataki (96 NY2d 532, 539-540 [2001]). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
Pataki. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
" [T]he due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as those required in a plenary criminal or civil trial' " (People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99, 105, lv denied 1 NY3d 502, quoting Doe v Pataki, 3 F Supp 2d 456, 470). [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:18 am
Pataki
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
