Search for: "People v. AG"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
(I do not suggest that your clients come to you for advice about how to lure under-age people for sexual purposes …but for the more general question…) [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
(People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:37 am
People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:02 pm
Caldwell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm
(People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm
Two years after the Katz decision, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
A recent New York Times editorial post stated that Congress is considering overturning a court ruling about age discrimination (Gross v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm
Pedley v Director of Public Prosecutions 2010 (QBD) (Meaning of ‘Children’s Playground’) D breached a Sexual Offences Prevention Order by observing young people playing in a skate park. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
The Workplace Safety and Insurance Act’s age cut-off for loss of earnings benefits does not violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Ontario’s Divisional Court decided in Gouthro v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
It's actually right.But it also says a lot about the age-old debate about "reasonable doubt".One way to feel okay about incarcerating innocent people is to futz with the underlying concept. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:18 am
(Before the murder, Perez had the dubious distinction of being committed to the California Youth Authority at age 14, making him "one of the youngest wards in the CYA system at the time. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:12 am
Rusis, et al v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:50 am
That said, 90-some percent of people have to start wearing reading glasses by age 40. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:07 am
Because of a precedent set by the 2008 Supreme Court decision in the case of Gross v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals reinstates an age-harassment and retaliation case.The case is Davis-Garett v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:12 am
Supreme Court case, O’Connor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:31 am
Schneiderman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
The decision sheds light on what the Court wants the complaints to look like.The case is Bohnet v. [read post]
