Search for: "People v. Allen (1993)" Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
As stated by Justice Cromwell for the Supreme Court, in Kerr v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Allen’s approach is not naive nor a descent into relativism. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am by INFORRM
  After all, statutory corporations such as local authorities are “legal persons” and cannot sue for libel (see Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
Allen, John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law at Northwestern University, in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]