Search for: "People v. Baker (1990)"
Results 41 - 60
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Calif. 2010) People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Baker, C. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am
Written statements from a number of other people were relied on by both sides. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Philadelphia and the Dilemma of Mass Imprisonment in the 1990s Law and Order Philadelphia”Kenneth S. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Id. at 9-10.Additional federal pharmacy-related requirements were imposed by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, but the Kowalski court held that this statute created no private right of action. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
He argued Buck v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Baker, 554 U. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court, on June 15, 2015, held in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Fla. 1999); Baker v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Ohio (1961); Baker v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Ohio (1961); Baker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Apex Marine, 498 U.S. 19 (1990). [read post]
