Search for: "People v. Black"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
Your client asserts that she ran not because she committed a robbery, but because she fears police encounters based on her familiarity with recent officer shootings of unarmed Black people, events which are a core concern of the Black Lives Matter movement. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
Black lecture on freedom of expression at Wesleyan University. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
But to pretend that racism and stereotypes don't play a role in some of the assessments we might make about individual people is, I think, a fair piece naive. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:41 am
Of the 210 people considered for jury duty, eight were black. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am
The defendant Flowers, who is black, allegedly murdered four people at a furniture store in Winona, Mississippi, three of whom were white. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
King v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:41 am
Delaware Vice Chancellor Leo Strine's opinion in Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
" See, Phalen v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 11:46 am
The 1999 case of R. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am
In 2020, Facebook banned them as hate speech when the images “caricature” black people. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
The majority opinion (written by Justice Chin) has a point. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
What sticks in our mind first is his comment that the court is “just nine old people in polyester black robes that we have to buy at the uniform supply store. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
That the SFPD flouted the law to spy on activists protesting the abuse and killing of Black people by the police is simply indefensible. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
So if that's indicative, I'd say that Black Friday is going strong. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
V. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
As the Court explained in Bartnicki v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
In a 1941 case called Associated Press v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
A lot of people misunderstand the issues in Ricci v. [read post]
