Search for: "People v. Childs (1970)"
Results 41 - 60
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Cisneros v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Kelly (1970). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Yesterday, I attended oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of McBurney v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm
"Teresa is a poster child for why the death penalty process is broken. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
Livingston (1970) 4 Cal.App.3d 251; People v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:13 am
In my latest FindLaw column, I discuss the Supreme Court's recent decision in FCC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Some people have been distorting my argument by pointing out that some people who were violent leftists in the 1960s and 1970s were friendly with politicians long, long, long after they re-entered the mainstream. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:46 am
Herrera v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:52 am
In California, we had a case called Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:33 pm
Indeed, farm labor by children was not banned under the law struck down by the Court in Hammer [v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
That rule makes clear that a parent-child tie can be created by consent without any biological tie.Moreover, to the extent the marital presumption is a benefit of marriage, rather than a tight proxy for a genetic tie, it must be available to same-sex as well as different-sex couples in order to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. 2d at 35-36 (holding state could not force Amish child to remain in formal high school until age sixteen); Pierce v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
By the 1980s, the Supreme Court has decided Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in a series of cases in the 1970s and 1980s that unwed fathers had constitutionally protected parental rights, which could not be categorically disregarded by state parentage and custody laws. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
In its landmark 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
