Search for: "People v. Corrigan" Results 41 - 60 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 In People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, the court ruled that under both state and federal law any statement made under the threat of dismissal from one's position is protected by the privilege against self-incrimination and is “automatically immunized from use in criminal proceedings. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:56 am
" Mich. top judges go wild [Detroit News] Feuding justices spar as they work [Detroit Free Press] People v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:38 am by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday, May 12, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order staying further trial court proceedings in the matter of People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:04 am by Jeanne Long
  In these cases, the Court will consider whether the rule of People v Adams, 262 Mich App 89 (2004), which held that the inability to pay is not a defense to the crime of felony non-support under MCL 750.165, is an incorrect reading of the statute or unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm by Madelaine Lane
  The Court granted leave to appeal in the matter of People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Many years and personnel changes later, that court corrected itself in People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:49 pm
The Court also ordered the Kent County Prosecuting Attorney to respond to an application for leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
Street commerce in drugs and sex forces innocent people to share their neighborhoods with pimps, prostitutes, and drug dealers who use their streets as a bazaar for illegal transactions. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or… [read post]