Search for: "People v. Forsyth" Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
(The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a First Amendment lawsuit by white nationalists in 1992, because even racist protests are protected by the First Amendment, see Forsyth County v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Men charged with breaching sanctions against Iraq in 2002 fail to convince Supreme Court that the UK had no power to create a criminal offence under the United Nations Act 1946. [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the Supreme Court has made clear that the government cannot even impose viewpoint-based demonstration security fees, even when the demonstration has an overt white nationalist message (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Phelps (2011); and (3) Forsyth County v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
In addition, any detainees who may have been subjected to unlawful treatment in detention including torture clearly pose a litigation risk to the United States.To this end, some insurance policies may cover people against mistreatment claims (see NYT piece here). [read post]