Search for: "People v. Green (1979)" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Query: So does this mean that paternalism is justified if, instead of an “assumption,” the government has actual evidence that people use information unwisely? [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Quick Point Pencil, 440 US 257, 263 (1979).Diamond v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Chicago v Green Bay at 3pm, Jets v Steelers at 6:30pm.Weather. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
He also notes that China may be "actively cornering the market" in the types of rare-earth minerals that will be essential to advanced green energy and computer technology (137). [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
“Harvard Law Revisited,” The Green Bag. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am by jamison
While the case made national news at the time, many people know about the case because of Fatal Vision, a book Joe McGinniss wrote about the case in 1983. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
I am always a bit humbled when a victim of food poisoning stands up to the corporations who poisoned them with food – especially food labeled “triple washed” and “ready to eat. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
People buying the spinach would not have known that any company but Dole was involved in the manufacturing process. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
People buying the spinach would not have known that any company but Dole was involved in the manufacturing process. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676-677 (1979), the evidence at trial established the following facts. [read post]