Search for: "People v. Lee (1986)"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Oliver Brown fue un personaje secundario, un nombre más entre un grupo de casi doscientos reclamantes que habían sido seleccionados para litigar por la NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), una organización creada en 1909 para promover los derechos de los negros. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Massachusetts in 1944 to Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
Lee (1982); Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
Lee. 3. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Mo. 1986)(relative risk of 2, or less, means exposure not the probable cause of disease claimed), aff’d in relevant part, 830 F.2d 831 (8th Cir. 1987) IUD Cases – Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Marder v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
Artists have legitimate reasons to use existing images beyond just to parody them or comment directly upon them and Cariou v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
"Location pins you down a hell of a lot," said Lee Tien, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Lee Ho, 120 N.J. 465, 472 (1990); Judson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
Wygant v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
That case is R. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
Rev. 1185 (1986). [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Kimberlin, 781 F.2d 1247 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 938, 107 S.Ct. 419, 93 L.Ed.2d 370 (1986); United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm
United States and Hill v. [read post]
