Search for: "People v. Main (1984)" Results 41 - 60 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the Cayuga Nation's main precedent on this point, Batra v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
What this study indicates, however, is that judges cited philosophers most often in criminal cases,[22] and only secondly in constitutional law cases.[23] Quantitatively, the third largest category was in “Civil Practice and Procedure”.[24] To assess the area of law for each case, the main subject heading assigned to each case by Carswell was used. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:43 am by Erik J. Heels
My first game was in 1976 (I was 10), and my dad took me to Red Sox games pretty much every year from 1976 to 1984. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm by Chuck Cosson
”[1] Which pretty succinctly states the main point of this entire series of blog posts:  that human agency matters. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Well one of the main 'themes' of 2017 was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content' around the globe, set in the context of possible reforms to copyright law. [read post]
But below the radar, the Executive Branch is engaging in the same type of infighting—on issues that matter and have the potential to harm LGB people across the country.Attorney General Jeff Sessions filed an unsolicited brief in Zarda v. [read post]