Search for: "People v. Martin (1978)"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
He was the point man in a court case that reverberates to this day, and he outsmarted many people who tried desperately to silence him. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Moreover, people often have multiple motives for what they say. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:53 am
"You tell Martin to get rid of that tape or there's gonna be people getting DUIs," she quoted Abbate as telling her, according to the transcript. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:11 am
The numbers were significant: 47 million people participating in 417,000 plans with approximately $2.5 trillion in assets. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Since the Klass and others v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Kinney v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Palm Beach City, 361 So. 2d 135, 137 n.7 (1978). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:22 am
In Gray v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Yero v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
Nonetheless, the volume of international communications in 1978 was exponentially smaller than it is today. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with… [read post]
