Search for: "People v. Miller (1970)"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
A complicating element in the case is Evon Miller, Mormon-born FBI agent in deep undercover, who is assigned to watch Feaver and finds herself, against her better inclinations, drawn to him–for Feaver is a character of almost Shakespearean contradictions. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
In the 1973 case of Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
Alien Tort Statute case, Filártiga v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
Van Leeuwen, 397 U.S. 249, 251 (1970). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Miller. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:06 am
In 2012, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:47 am
Photo by Shawn Miller. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
nolanguage=en+-+t-623373. [9] 56th Miller Lecture: Internet Revolutionized Creativity, Changing IP Law, Georgia State University (Sep. 17, 2015), http://law.gsu.edu/2015/09/17/56th-miller-lecture/. [10] Williams v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Photo Source: Shawn Miller. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:46 pm
“In the 1970s, the Supreme Court handed down Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
