Search for: "People v. Miller (1989)"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Peoples, 29 M.J. 426 (C.M.A. 1990); United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
Just do it, people. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:04 pm
The result: Deandre Woolfolk, who was born January 29, 1989, and who murdered Mone Little on January 28, 2007, is treated as not having turned 18 on that day, and thus gets the benefit of Miller v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 412 (1989) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994, 999 (2d Cir. 1989), and what the Ninth Circuit held as to the song title “Barbie Girl,” which deliberately referenced Barbie, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Med. 997 (1989); Troyen A. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Bell, 649 N.W. 2d 243, 252 (N.D. 2002) (noting the legislature amended North Dakota’s drug laws in 1989 to include the culpability requirement of “willfully” as an element of the offense of possession of a controlled substance, thereby eliminating possession as a strict liability offense); State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:31 pm
Also today, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Miller v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Together with Opinions in the Cases Decided at January Term, 1837, Arising on the Restraints on the Powers of the States (1837) Samuel Freeman Miller, Lectures on the Constitution of the United States (1891) William H. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 9:29 am
Miller, 5 Federal Practice and Procedure § 1351 (West 1969, 1989 Supp.). [read post]
