Search for: "People v. Myers (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Bristol-Myers Squibb, 97 F. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007),  an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
As I’ve researched this question, I’ve realized more and more that one of the keys to understanding the history is understanding how people in the 18th and 19th centuries conceived “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Myers (1983) that public employee speech is protected from retaliation if the employee spoke out on a matter of public concern. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Resolving the centi-million dollar battle will require interpreting the parties’ contract, originally written in 1983 and amended many times. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:46 am by Brad Wendel
Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983), the Court reasoned that the sheriff’s interest in the effective functioning of his office did not outweigh the employee’s right to speak out on matters of public concern. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:46 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am by Steve McConnell
Bristol-Myers SquibbJudge Wood’s only opinion regarding medical devices, Schrott v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Upjohn Co., 697 F.2d 644, 648 (5th Cir. 1983); Mahr v. [read post]