Search for: "People v. Oliver" Results 41 - 60 of 632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
Last month, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), the first libel case to consider the “serious harm” test under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 within the context of a social media post. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm by J
HHJ Oliver-Jones QC (sitting as a deputy High Court Judge) granted an order on a quia timet basis. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
In order to be defamatory, a statement must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and carry a meaning that adversely affects the attitude of other people towards the subject. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Separate reasons in Oliver Douglas v McLernon [No 3] were published by His Honour in respect of a “no case to answer” submission made by Toni Fitzgerald in one of the proceedings. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:35 pm by Brad Kuhn
 This question was recently answered by the Court of Appeal in Olive Lane Industrial Park v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
We had a post from Oliver Cox on the judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Greenwood); in one’s “open field” in the area beyond the curtilage around one’s home, even if the field is surrounded by fencing and no-trespass signs (Oliver v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:56 am by Julie Lam
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v Oliver, No. 142895, the Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the Muskegon Circuit Court to enter an amended judgment of sentence granting the defendant sentencing credit for the period of time he was incarcerated as a condition of probation. [read post]