Search for: "People v. Richard (1978)" Results 41 - 60 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
The Chief Justice was also in the majority of the part of the 1978 Baake decision on affirmative action, and in the dissent in the 1978 Penn Central decision on takings and historic preservation. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Richards, Neil, Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age (2015). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
After you graduated high school in 1978, you departed for bucolic Cambridge, MA, where you graduated with honors and joined Phi Beta Kappa. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [9] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
Unless the next two Supreme Court appointees are strong opponents of racial preferences — a most unlikely prospect — the Court’s role since the 1978 Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 6:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 1978, however, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Pence v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
To reach this aim, living standards of the people had to be raised and productive capacities developed. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [8] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]