Search for: "People v. Strong (1994)" Results 41 - 60 of 331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
The case is as famous for that rule—which has turned out to be a strong shield against libel lawsuits brought by powerful people to discourage criticism—as it is for declaring the “central meaning” of the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:33 pm by Ilya Somin
(In re Pedro T. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1041, 1048 ["[i]t is axiomatic that in assessing the import of a statute, we must concern ourselves with the Legislature's purpose at the time of the enactment"]; San Bernadino Valley Audubon Society v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Such a mindset was almost always implicated in all the stories of history’s genocides—down to the last big one in Rwanda in 1994. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:28 am by Antti Ruokonen
The total population of Finland at the time was under 4 million people. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by William B. Gould IV
Can you give us some background on the OSHA case that has gotten so much attention, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court finds that Plaintiff has not made a strong showing that she will suffer substantial emotional harm if she is required to prosecute this case in her true name. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Natasha Brunstein
American Telephone & Telegraph in 1994 and FDA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]