Search for: "People v. Thomas (1996)" Results 41 - 60 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
If nominated and confirmed, Kruger – who is just 45 years old – would be not only the first Black woman on the court, but also the youngest justice by over four years and the youngest justice confirmed since Clarence Thomas joined the court in 1991 at age 43. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfEarlier today the Supreme Court granted review in two cases that pose the same question: "Should this Court overrule Grutter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
Inforrm has an article on the recent decision by Twitter to ban posting images of people without their consent. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
Double since 1996 and began charging people to access the site two years later. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:10 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
Family law cases involve people, not governments and corporations, and quite often these people have children. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
San Bernardino Valley College, 92 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 1996) (which the Report did not discuss either). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
She wrote about this week and explained how Justice Thomas’s use of the words (“cleaned up”) in parentheses in the brown bag v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]