Search for: "People v. Woods (1998)"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2024, 11:25 am
In the meantime, the claimants had renewed their planning application, in the same terms, in 1998. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
Kovacic involves a qualified immunity claim by a social worker who was sued for removing children from their home without first obtaining a warrant; perhaps it will be GVR’d in light of Wood v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
, certif. denied, 154 N.J. 608 (1998). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:18 am
In 2009, alternative energy spent $30 million on lobbying, 12 times its 1998 amount. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm
Wood [2011] EWHC 1972 (QB) at [20] that information published in the Daily Mail breached the order of Mr Justice Blake, and the consideration by Mr Justice Tugendhat in TSE and ELP v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Trademark registration in China (China Law Blog) Another ridiculous IPR protection awareness event (China Hearsay) Colombia Colombia’s Senate approves accession to Madrid Protocol in second reading (Managing IP) Europe EU member states sign agreement in principle on establishing single EU patent (Managing IP) (IAM) (Blog@IPJUR.com) (IPKat) Lisbon treaty updates EU; new commissioners named (IP Watch) Hague Agreement: you win some, you lose some – Germany… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
(Hodgins v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
People get shot. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Circuit, from 1997-1998 then with the late Justice Antonin Scalia, from 1998-1999. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda… [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
This case is the latest in a line of representative claims that have been withdrawn since the Supreme Court’s decision in Lloyd v Google, which determined that damages could only be awarded following individualised assessment, and were not available under the Data Protection Act 1998 merely for “loss of control” of personal data: proof of damage or distress was necessary. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 1:45 am
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
But below the radar, the Executive Branch is engaging in the same type of infighting—on issues that matter and have the potential to harm LGB people across the country.Attorney General Jeff Sessions filed an unsolicited brief in Zarda v. [read post]
