Search for: "Perez v. Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The decision in Perez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
Perez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
Perez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
The Court of Appeals agrees he might have a claim.The case is Perez v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
The Court heard argument Monday in Perez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 10:50 am
Indiana Department of Corrections, 2014 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:38 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:17 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
The appeals court pointed out that the DOL’s case would depend on the information received from 150 other state employees who had consented to the disclosure of their identities, and that the state employer already had this information in its possession (Perez v United States District Court, Tacoma, April 18, 2014, Trott, S). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:57 am
The employer was therefore entitled to attorneys’ fees under the EAJA (Gate Guard Services v Perez, April 7, 2014, Rainey, J). [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Perez, 737 F.3d 1117 (7th Cir. 2013) Pseudonymous MK, a worker in Cat’s packing department, developed epidcondylitis (tennis elbow). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am
Because the ALJ ignored the weight of scientific evidence and the full OSHA Review Commission declined to intervene, the appeals court granted the employer’s petition for review and vacated the citation (Caterpillar Logistics, Inc v Perez, December 12, 2013, Easterbrook, F). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:35 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:18 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Washington Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Anglin Co. v. [read post]