Search for: "Peter v. Progressive Corp."
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 9:23 pm
Peter W. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
Peters, 450 Fed.Appx. 470, 478-79 (6th Cir. 2011) (affirming summary judgment for defendants when plaintiffs expert witnesses failed to provide clear testimony that plaintiff specific condition would have been improved by timely administration of therapy); Bonesmo v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Andrew Haas, Comments from the General President, 18 Asbestos Worker (Nov. 1972) (cited by Peter W.J. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Patricia Aufderheide and Peter Jaszi argue that Shepard Fairey had the “fair use right” to make his famous Obama poster. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Alice v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Panning out, and examining the forest, as opposed to the trees, it seems questionable how any of these specific styles of litigation serve copyright law’s fundamental goal of promoting the progress of science and the useful arts.2 This Part briefly analyzes the premises on which copyright law in America is based. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Last week, a Manhattan appellate panel in Antonini v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:42 am
Also, Trevor Potter wrapped up with an assessment of the DC Circuit Court decision on the Van Hollen v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
As well as sharing David Cameron’s text-speak (lol), Brooks provided the inquiry with an email sent to her by News Corp’s head of communications, Frederic Michel. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
The progress of this proposal will almost certainly be among the most closely-watched developments in Canadian M&A in 2012. 4. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Peter K. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
In other words, they lubricate the Constitutional mandate “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts” by creating a ready market for inventions. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Study suggests ‘not much (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Green sunset? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:47 am
(Hand later took this approach even further in Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
