Search for: "Pigeon v. Pigeon" Results 41 - 60 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2016, 3:26 pm by familoo
Apologies for any typos and the lack of graceful construction – wanted to blog about this but am racing against approaching zonking out having just spent 3 days “doing London” with the kids (gosh, isn’t Trafalgar square much nicer without the pigeon sh*t everywhere?). [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
The IPKat is delighted to host a guest contribution by Simon Chapman (Lewis Silkin) on this very topic and on a case (Jack Wills v House of Fraser) in which he and his team have acted for the defendant.Here's what Simon writes:"Following Mr Justice Arnold’s finding (Jack Wills Limited v House of Fraser (Stores) Limited [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch)) that retailer House of Fraser was liable for trade mark infringement and passing off after adopting a… [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd [1997] R.P.C. 513) here: there again the claimant succeeded in a passing off action but had four of its pictorial Penguin marks revoked. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Going farther than simply holding that the lower court temporary support award was inadequate, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its September, 2015, decision in Kaufman v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm by David Smith
Charalambous & Anor v Maureen Rosairie Ng & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1604 The Court of Appeal has again thrown the cat among the tenancy deposit protection pigeons. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:17 pm
The problem is that these exemptions are tightly pigeon holed, and unless a transfer falls squarely within a pigeon hole, the transferee in a non-market transaction may be caught by a significant tax. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:52 am
 Said CCC, CCL's use of names and domain names including the word "Cranford", and its use of logos and trade marks featuring a bird ["apparently a pigeon", observed the judge, displaying an impressive degree of ornithological knowledge], constituted an actionable passing off. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm by Joe Patrice
[Jezebel] * Are you keeping up with Kirby v. [read post]