Search for: "Polston" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court's majority opinon - one dissent (Wells, J) and two non-participants (Canady and Polston, JJ) - resulted from an appeal of the 4th DCA's decision. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 3:43 pm
"It's one of those weird things," IDEM spokesman Steve Polston said about the complaint. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
  Justice Polston wrote a dissent and was joined by Justice Canady and Chief Justice Quince. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 12:33 pm by Michael Froomkin
Canady75 YES – Retain Jorge Labarga78 NO– Do NOT retain Ricky Polston 3rd DCA79 Retain Edwin A.Scales81 Retain Linda Ann Wells 11th Judicial Circuit83 Mark Blumstein85 Carol “Jodie” BreeceMore County Races89 Modesto “Mo” Abety for School Board (this one is easy) 92 Raquel Regalado for Mayor (this one is hard, especially after a very dispiriting final week’s campaign)State Constitutional Amendments201 NO!!! [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Chief Justice Polston dissented (Delva v The Continental Group, Inc, April 17, 2014, Pariente, B). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:24 am
Justice Polston asked whether any evidence existed that no attorney would take the case. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:15 pm by appealattorneylaw
  For example, out of the 9 opinions released in criminal appeals since September 13, 2012: (1) two opinions are more than 80 pages long; (2) two opinions are approximately 40 pages long; (3) four of the opinions are signed by all 7 Justices; and, (4) only 1 opinion had even a partial dissent, and that dissent was written by Chief Justice Polston, rather than the Court’s usual dissenters in criminal cases. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Perry agreed to reject part of the 2005 law while Chief Justices Charles Canady and Ricky Polston in the Florida Supreme Court dissented. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 12:26 pm
Justice Polston and Justice Labarga dissented to the Court's decision to accept jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:43 pm
Chief Justice Canady concurred "in result" and Justice Polston concurred "in result only. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm by CAPTAIN
  Canady wrote a dissent with Polston joining.In reversing the lower court, Lewis wrote:  " ... [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by Jacek Stramski
” The lone dissent by Justice Polston posited that the term “pregnancy” should not be read into FCRA as it was not explicitly included in the statute. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:03 pm
" Chief Justice Canady, in an opinion concurring in result and joined by Justice Polston, would have reached the constitutional issue. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 8:40 am by Jacek Stramski
” By contrast, Justices Canady and Polston would have rejected the access to courts challenge on the basis that in 1968, when the constitutional access to courts provision was adopted, the remedies available to a claimant for benefits were lower than even those permitted under the 104 week limitation of section 440.15(2)(a). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm by Robert C. Weill
Justices Canady and Polston dissented based on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]