Search for: "Poore v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
Many people laughed at the absurdity of the government’s pandering to the clueless, the appeal to emotion of the poor victims, the desire for safety uber alles. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 2:09 pm
A petition for certiorari (full text) was filed yesterday, captioned Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:05 pm
"A defendant charged with felony DUI may move to dismiss the charge by alleging that the state is improperly relying on a prior uncounseled misdemeanor DUI conviction," the Court ruled, citing the state Supreme Court's 2008 decision in State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am
[SCOTUS dodged this issue in Little Sisters of the Poor, but W.V. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 4:50 am
US v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm
By Mark Apostolos, Albany Government Law Review[1] Product manufacturers are generally required by state law to sell a product that: (1) is free of design or manufacturing defects, and (2) carries appropriate warnings putting customers on notice as to the … Continue reading → [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:05 am
In February, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision striking down a Florida law requiring Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) applicants to submit to suspicionless drug tests in Lebron v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:46 am
What about State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:46 am
What about State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:31 am
The First Department, citing People v Reason, 37 NY2d 351 [1975], stated that this was not a proper basis upon which to deny the defendant's request. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm
So if $600 gets garnished from your monthly Social Security check to pay your IRS debt, that $600 still counts as part of your monthly income to determine what welfare programs for which you might or might not be eligible.Now, Legal Aid has a point; that's somewhat silly, because you're still poor, since you don't actually get the $600, so it seems a bit crazy to say that you're not poor because "in theory" you get an extra $600 a month (that you… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 9:43 am
The four are: (1) whether members of the class "exhibit obvious, immutable, or distinguishable characteristics that define them as a discrete group;" (the Court adopted this standard in the 1986 case of Lyng v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:32 pm
Batterman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:26 am
Here are the materials in Poor Bear v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 6:37 pm
"Despite the fact that Gideon v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 12:53 pm
In a Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
