Search for: "Powell v. May et al" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
WHITTINGTON, ET AL., No. 10-0316 Opinion of the Court Concurring and Dissenting This is a potentially major takings case about when government can take property for private (rather than public) benefit. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” Appellants [Judith Miller et al.] argue that “this proposition of law is flatly contrary to the great weight of authority in this and other circuits. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Management Hospitality of Racine, Inc. d/b/a International House of Pancakes, et al., No. 10-3247 (7th Cir. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Supp. 740, 785, 836 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (“A government administrative agency may regulate or prohibit the use of toxic substances through rulemaking, despite a very low probability of any causal relationship. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
11 years later, Scallan et al. have produced "Sons of Mead," which include substantial improvements to the methods used by Mead et al. and to the quality and timeliness of data (1,2). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Amicus brief of the Town of Verona and Town of Vernon, New YorkAmicus brief of Cayuga County and Seneca CountyAmicus brief of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation et al. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
NanceDocket: 09-1115Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer may be held liable on a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
O’Brien, et al. (08-1569), asking whether, when Congress has imposed a mandatory minimum  sentence for using a specific kind of gun during a violent or drug crimes, the jury or the judge is to make the finding on the type of gun. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Wilson IV (Wilson, et al., v. [read post]