Search for: "Powers v. Miller"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 8:13 am
Remedies, not rights, are what give it power. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:50 am
In Miller v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Francois and his co-counsel, the much more experienced civil rights litigator Loren Miller, used the case to attack Plessy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:13 pm
For instance, in Miller v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that it is for the UK Parliament to change the law of the land, but that the devolved legislatures are entitled to have a voice in that decision also. 15.38 The Lord Advocate replies that the legislative consent convention is no longer merely a convention, but is now converted into a rule of law because it has been enacted into statute by the Scotland Act 2016. 15.36 Lord Mance is asking the Lord Advocate whether the legislative consent convention is properly a constitutional… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:18 pm
" Coleman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:00 am
This is the central question in First Choice Plumbing Corp. v Miller Law Offs., PLLC 2018 NY Slip Op 05825 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 9:08 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
Supreme Court decided yesterday that Congress has broad powers to place works in the public domain under copyright. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Robinson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:16 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:13 pm
The rule announced in Miller v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
More on Ring v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 9:07 pm
Miller v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 8:10 am
Jason Lyle Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
Miller having satisfied all known tests for retroactivity, Miller applies retroactively.In Horsely v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a few years ago in Arlington v. [read post]
