Search for: "Powers v. Planned Parenthood"
Results 41 - 60
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 8:23 am
Planned Parenthood and Andersen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
When the Supreme Court announced its decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
Planned Parenthood (1992) (plurality opinion) (employing an “undue burden” test in the context of the fundamental liberty interest in procuring an abortion because “the State’s interest in the potential life within the woman” justifies certain regulations). ] Lawrence is not to the contrary. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
(emphasis added)This one little passage is big, because it represents the first time a majority of the Court has invoked this stare decisis requirement of a “special justification” – above and beyond the wrongness of a prior decision – in a constitutional setting since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
Anyway, here's what Luttig wrote: I understand the Supreme Court to have intended its decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
Carhart, 413 F. 3d, at 796; Planned Parenthood, 435 F. 3d, at 1173; see also Nat. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
On the legal side, several Supreme Court justices engaged in a lengthy discussion of this question in 1992, when they considered the precedential status of Roe in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
In 1992, in a challenge to such a law in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:55 am
In Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 10:41 am
” The difference between the Fourth Circuit’s ruling and the Fifth Circuit’s decision in 2012 turns on their conflicting interpretations in a single paragraph of the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
The draft explicitly reversed Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
Wade, as follows: "I write separately to to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including [Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa v.] [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 574 (2003) (quoting Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
As Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that was first published at Howe on the Court, the justices did not add any cases to their merits docket, but they did deny certiorari in a case in which Planned Parenthood had asked the court to block enforcement of an Arkansas law regulating medication abortions, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm
(In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:31 am
Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng., 546 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
Planned Parenthood not to disturb a lower-court ruling striking down Indiana’s ban on abortions based on the disability, sex or race of the fetus, agreeing with Justice Clarence Thomas that “the Court is ‘dutybound’ to address legalized abortion’s scope. [read post]
