Search for: "Powers v. State Bar (1988)"
Results 41 - 60
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(2) bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings previously initiated against the person sought for that offense. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 808–09 (1988) (citations omitted); see also Cedars-Sinai Med. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Rice argues that Plaintiff's claim is barred by the Supreme Court's decision in Heck v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
State v Williams, 2011 Ohio 3374. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
Ill. 1994) (holding that the Fourth Amendment barred warrantless sweeps through public housing projects); Resident Action Council v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
[Emphasis added.]As stated more recently in Hryniak v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
The only interesting question suggested by Bill 1098 is why the CT legislature would propose a bill that would serve only to provide some lucky lawyer with some section 1988 "prevailing party" fees during a lean period for the bar. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm
Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the authorities in the Requested State have decided not to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:30 am
Common law damages suits against federal officers are said to have remained routinely available until after Bivens was decided when, in the 1988 Westfall Act, Congress barred state-law tort suits against federal officers acting within the scope of their employment.Through case studies of litigation against federal officers involved in customs enforcement and maritime seizures, this Essay qualifies and revises these claims. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
That is a highly contestable assumption, particularly in the modern administrative state and given modern congressional practice. [8] Indeed, such a mode of interpretation would confront Congress with an unenviable choice that could lead to more, not less, capacious delegations of quasi-legislative powers to agencies. [read post]
