Search for: "Price v. Phillips"
Results 41 - 60
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
Potts v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
Blog post: 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Pre-Trial Brief and Exhibits. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
An excerpt, on Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d at 51–52; see also 5C PHILLIP E. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm
Phillips doesn’t mention that case, but he does try to reconcile his reading with Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Allowing NML Capital’s appeal, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Clarke, Mance, Collins and Walker) held that it was entitled to do so. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm
” In the view of Commissioner Phillips, the plaintiff “failed to prove that the [Agreements] caused the price differential. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate On December 29, 2011, legislation to dissolve all redevelopment agencies became effective when the California Supreme Court released its opinion in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:28 am
From Chasnoff v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:15 pm
It is true that Fischel was the only "substantive defense witness" (Phillip Anschutz and a Catholic Abbot were the only other witnesses called by the Defendant). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Rival online sellers generally offer lower prices than 1-800 Contacts, and much of the advertising for those retailers emphasizes those lower prices. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:26 am
Our case of the day is Phillips v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am
Continuing with our settlement theme, this post discusses True v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
