Search for: "Proctor v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:15 pm
Proctor Hosp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 pm
Just as Justice Scalia wrote in Bray v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
In Alexis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:38 am
The trial judge reduced the damages to $6,000,000 for pain and suffering and $600,000 for loss of consortium, In Nemeth v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:45 pm
Temporary producers are not eligible for non-resident licenses in other states. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(See: Hamilton, para. 37) The Applicant’s factum states, the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:12 am
Proctor Hospital in this context, if the shoe fits.) [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
Proctor, 125 U.S. 136 (1888). [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 10:38 am
Jackson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
Zim Properties Ltd v Proctor (1985): Compromise of Action, Compensation and CGTDavid Salter15. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
The Press Release states: A federal jury today convicted Dr. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:37 am
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
Rejecting this, the Information Commissioner stated that the CPS confirmed that it had the information and that the legal note prepared 17 years ago is still current. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
