Search for: "Proskauer Rose LLP"
Results 41 - 60
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2020, 2:00 am
The country is consumed with news of the spread of COVID-19, known as coronavirus. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am
Defendants cannot recast the claim as one for breach of contract to avail themselves of the longer six-year limitations period (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 68 [1st Dept 2015], citing Kliment, 3 NY3d at 541-42; see Risk Control Assocs. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:57 am
Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 A.D.3 at 67; Cabrera v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 A.D.3d 59, 68 (1st Dept. 2015). [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
In any event, the original verified complaint does not allege intentional and malicious treatment of plaintiff or wanton dishonesty suggestive of criminal indifference to civil obligations sufficient to support an award of punitive damages (see Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 73 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
Plaintiff alleged that “[her] fee bore no rational relationship to the product delivered,” and detailed that, in exchange for the $25,000 fee, defendants produced only a draft complaint that was essentially identical to the one that she had presented to them (see Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 70 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
“The IRS reasoned that, under the circumstances, the increase to the payment amount is caused by an amendment to increase benefits, which is one of the limited circumstances when an increase to the payment amount is permitted,” said Proskauer Rose LLP benefits attorneys Seth Safra and Malerie L. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:09 am
Defendant Proskauer Rose (“Proskauer”) represented A&O in that 2011 action. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 6:04 am
Securities cases often are interconnected and difficult to maneuver, and attorneys should not step into parallel proceedings without considering how their choices in one case can filter into other matters, according to Ralph Ferrara, Ann Ashton and Corey Rogoff of Proskauer Rose LLP. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:50 am
Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 A.D.3d 59, 68 (1st Dept 2015) (“while there was certainly the possibility that the need for future legal work would be required with respect to the tax strategy (promoted by the defendants), plaintiffs could not have ‘acutely’ anticipated the need for farther counsel from defendants that would trigger the continuous representation toil”). [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 1:59 pm
She was an associate at Foley and Lardner LLP from 1996 to 1999, at Weissburg and Aronson from 1995 to 1996 and at Proskauer Rose LLP from 1994 to 1995. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 11:07 pm
In the interview, Douglas shares how he started off practicing law at Proskauer Rose LLP after graduating from the University of Virginia School of Law. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:21 am
(Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d at 65) Because SAi claims that “[b]ut for Furgang’s2 departure from the ordinary standards of professional conduct, SAi would … have [saved] more than $300,000 in legal fees”, SAi states that “‘but for’ [F&A’s] negligence[,] [SAi] … would not have sustained ‘actual and ascertainable’ damages. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
McKenna, Proskauer Rose LLP represents management. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
McKenna, Proskauer Rose LLP represents management. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
Further, the continuous representation doctrine does not apply where there is only a vague “ongoing representation” (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 68 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:38 am
Might Affect Rule’s Review “[T]he decision articulates principles that could embolden the Trump administration’s general deregulatory agenda and might affect the Department’s review of the fiduciary rule,” law firm Proskauer Rose LLP said in a March 16 client bulletin. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:38 am
Might Affect Rule’s Review “[T]he decision articulates principles that could embolden the Trump administration’s general deregulatory agenda and might affect the Department’s review of the fiduciary rule,” law firm Proskauer Rose LLP said in a March 16 client bulletin. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
“Employers should consider whether they wish to continue the practice of canceling deferred compensation plan deferrals after a 401(k) plan hardship distribution once the new 401(k) rule is in place,” said a February 14 Proskauer Rose LLP client bulletin on the changes. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
“Employers should consider whether they wish to continue the practice of canceling deferred compensation plan deferrals after a 401(k) plan hardship distribution once the new 401(k) rule is in place,” said a February 14 Proskauer Rose LLP client bulletin on the changes. [read post]
