Search for: "Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. United States"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Provident Life & Accident Ins. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm
Life Ins. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
[Courts have] repeatedly recognized the overriding policy considerations that attach to prescription drugs, given their unique life-saving attributes and their dependence upon extensive scientific research and continual innovation. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:20 am
Hartford Life & Accident Ins. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
Provident Life & Accident Ins. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
The Appellate Division stated that while its authority is as broad as Supreme Court's regarding maintenance it generally accords deference to Supreme Court's determination regarding the amount and duration of maintenance" 'as long as the court considers the statutory factors and provides a basis for its conclusion. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm
Weekly D792aCondominiums -- Assessment liens -- Assessment lien could not properly be imposed in favor of condominium association upon a unit for the repair of an air conditioner under either the declaration of condominium or the 1976 Condominium ActReported at 35 Fla. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Rule 8(b) and Rule 14; and 2) the government violated Brady, when it failed to produce arguably exculpatory evidence with respect to a charged co-conspirator until the week of trial. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Soul Pattinson & Co Ltd. [read post]
