Search for: "Public Service, Etc. v. Public Util., Etc."
Results 41 - 60
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
Cisco Tech. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Need to vividly expose the courts to the public for whom the D stands, though that didn’t work w/composers etc in Golan and Eldred. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
[Post by Venkat] Ferrington v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:00 am
Its services relate to right-of-way acquisition, servitudes, real estate brokerage, permitting, and property management—across several industries, including utilities, oil and gas, renewable energy, and public works. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 8:47 am
Aereo defends, relying primarily on the 2d Circuit’s Cablevision case from several years ago (which I was also involved in, and which I blogged about here), which held that a cable system’s DVR service (which did more-or-less what Aereo is doing, except for cable programming rather than over-the-air broadcasts) was NOT infringing copyright because the service, which allowed individual users to utilize “their own” recordings, was not… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:24 am
[Post by Venkat] McMillen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:24 am
We should also keep an eye out for the appeal to the Upper Tribunal in Fish Legal and Shirley v IC and United Utilities Water plc and others, due to be heard in early 2012 – in which the Smartsource decision stands to be reviewed. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
The Thursday statement from the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said only providers who wanted to offer services to the public would need to submit security assessments, suggesting that firms working on enterprise-facing products would be given leeway. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
For example, an insured business can be reimbursed for the extra expense it incurred to purchase power from a public utility until its alternative power-generating equipment is repaired or replaced. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Of course, there is still the question whether the restriction caused by these seditious offences is no more than necessary to limit the right to freedom of expression and of publication, etc. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
After a July 25, 2024 public hearing, the DWC proposed Utilization Review regulations which were undergoing public comment at the time this foreword went to press: https://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/DWCPropRegs/2024/Utilization-Review/Index.htm Readers are advised to periodically check the DWC regulations webpage for updates on proposed and approved regulations: https://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/Laws_Regulations.htm III. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 5:00 pm
” This important comment in the SCC’s 2015 CBC v. [read post]
Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference
30 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
Apple v Samsung changed perceptions. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
• Beye v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:46 pm
On July 17, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Hunley v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm
There is a functionality screen in utility patent: utility. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:21 pm
. ________________________________________ LANDLORD'S WAIVER: "A MUST DOCUMENT" By Barry V. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:38 pm
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
There is a presumption of freedom to build on land (subject to planning etc etc). [read post]
