Search for: "Public Service Company v. Brown" Results 41 - 60 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:24 pm
The company submitted a cert petition noting that the US Supreme Court had recently reversed the Florida’s state court ruling in KPMB v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Circuit case (opinion by Justice Janice Rogers Brown) striking down a delegation of regulatory authority to Amtrak on private non-delegation doctrine grounds. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Klutznik the Court addressed a congressional law that required local governments who accepted federal funding for public works to spend at least ten percent of the federal monies on goods and services provided by minority-owned companies, and the justices there characterized the federal government’s actions as a racial classification. [read post]