Search for: "Railroad Commission of Texas v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
The law “subjects to the practically uncontrolled discretion of the Commission every issue or general sale of stocks, bonds, or securities hereafter to be made in Michigan. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Indeed, this was the approach that the CSX Railroad took in seeking redress from fraudfeasor radiologist Dr. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission issued new Draft Merger Guidelines. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
An option would be to provide for greater state agency involvement with authority to review settlements. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
The Commission denied review, making the ALJ’s decision the Commission’s final order. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
