Search for: "Regan v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Regan, 453 U.S. 654 (1981) Apodaca v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:11 pm
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
” Judge Cardona also cited Lake v Regan [supra] in support of his position. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Thro, Undermining Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:14 pm
Regan, the Supreme Court addressed an instance in which the federal government sought to bar a state from pursing a remedy due to the AIA. 465 U.S. 367 (1984). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:37 am
Dec. 11, 2012); Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:29 pm
--Regan v Faurecia Automotive Seating, Inc, Case No. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:29 pm
--Regan v Faurecia Automotive Seating, Inc, Case No. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
The employee was injured during a lunch break [Nappi v Regan, 186 AD2d 855]; and 3. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The same it true with respect to participants in the Optional Retirement Program available to certain employees of the State University, the City University, the Community Colleges the Statutory Contract Colleges at Cornell and Alfred Universities and the State Department of Education.. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:48 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kevin Regan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:48 pm
In Johnmohammadi v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:32 pm
The post October 24, 2020 Is National Drug Take Back Day appeared first on Regan Zambri Long. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:33 am
The post April 24, 2021 – Annual Drug Take Back Day appeared first on Regan Zambri Long. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Austin [v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
”Finding that “substantial evidence supports a finding that [Booth’s] injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment,” the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's determination.In contrast, in Beachy v Regan, 119 AD2d 967, the court ruled that a back injury suffered during practice for an employer-sponsored tug-of-war contest while the employee was “on regular pay” was a work-related for the purposes of eligibility for… [read post]