Search for: "Richard v. Res Care, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The intention of the Board is not to re-regulate the rail industry with burdensome new rules. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Rothman was encouraged to target these three issues by the lower courts’ opinions in the Daubert case, in which the courts made blanket statements about the role of absent statistical significance and peer review, and the illegitimacy of “re-analyses” of published studies. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
”). 4 See, e.g., Richard Doll & Richard Peto, The Causes of Cancer 1219 (1981) (“when relative risk lies between 1 and 2 … problems of interpretation may become acute, and it may be extremely difficult to disentangle the various contributions of biased information, confounding of two or more factors, and cause and effect. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011), cert. denied sub nom., U.S. [read post]