Search for: "Rivera v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
Supreme Court today decided Rivera v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 12:09 pm
US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:26 am
Apr. 26, 2022), the Circuit (Nardini, joined by Sack and Park), held that a state trial court’s erroneous denial of a defendant’s peremptory strike does not violate the federal Constitution under Rivera v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:00 am
While Rivera claimed that his state of intoxication negated the “knowingly” element of the crime, he apparently failed to raise that defense at the time of trial.And since nothing in the record suggested that he was “under the influence” at the time of the incident, the AD1 was of the opinion that the lower court’s verdict was consistent with the evidence.We're betting Rivera was drunk with sorrow after that… [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:47 pm
There will probably never be a record of trial in the court-martial case of United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 4:33 am
New York City Fire Department Emergency Medical Technician terminated after testing positive for cocaine NYC Fire Department v Rivera, OATH Index #3416/09OATH Administrative Law Judge Julio Rodriguez recommended termination of Carlos Rivera, a New York City Fire Department EMT.Rivera tested positive for cocaine in a random workplace drug test -- registering more than 250 times the official cut-off.The Department had previously sent him for voluntary rehabilitation three… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 10:14 am
Grasshopper Motorcycles, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
Rivera v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
Wiretap guru Judge Betty Fletcher (left) brings us a disappointing Title III decision this week in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:24 pm
(The court notes that a different standard applies the motions based on Brady information see United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
Pittman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
” The Appellate Division then unanimously reversed the lower court’s rulings “on the law,” vacating the default judgment, denying Rivera’s petition and dismissing the proceeding.* Termination of an employee for failure to posses a valid license required to perform the duties of the position is not disciplinary in nature and thus was subject to neither the pre-termination disciplinary procedures set out in a collective bargaining agreement nor the… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 12:06 am
Per Rivera v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
APPEAL/PLEA AGREEMENTUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:25 am
Rivera, 2009 U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:07 am
Under New York State law, a probationary employee such as Rivera has no property interest in her job that would entitle her to due process rights; and 2. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
