Search for: "Roberts v. Bureau of Prisons"
Results 41 - 60
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:19 am
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am
” Helen Klein outlined Jawad v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Robert M. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 4:49 am
Cohen, Cohen v Trump Org. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
The federal Bureau of Prisons facility for most of those who have been certified as “sexually dangerous” is at Butner, N.C., in the Fourth Circuit’s area. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Freeland’s argument, the adoption of an across-the-board rule providing for a fixed reduction in crack cocaine sentences by the Sentencing Commission or Bureau of Prisons would be constitutionally suspect. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am
The case of Ashcroft -v- Iqal involved the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm
The legislation directly responds to the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:04 pm
” Although all four of these justices seemed skeptical of Ramirez’s argument, Justices Alito, Roberts, and Thomas joined the majority in Burwell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Mark Dershwitz)..........................................21Ex. 4R, Addendum to Bureau of Prisons Exe-cution Protocol Federal Death Sentence Im-plementation Procedures (effective July 1,2007), Decl. of Dr. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
See, e.g., Ali v.Federal Bureau of Prisons, 552 U.S. 214, 219 (2008) (discussing cases and concluding “Congress’ use of “any” to modify “other law enforcement officer” is most naturally read to mean law enforcement officers of whatever kind”) (Thomas, J.); United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm
Given that his second sentence was ordered to run concurrent with the first sentence, he is now facing the reality of serving approximately 81 months or 6 ½ years in the custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons, far below what most non-violent drug offenders will serve. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:39 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
" Bureau of Prisons officials interpret "term of imprisonment" to mean time served, not the sentence imposed - a policy that results in seven fewer days of available credit for each year of the actual sentence, the petition argued. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
., v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
IMPRINT Washington, D.C. : Bureau of National Affairs, c2001. [read post]