Search for: "Roche Holding Limited"
Results 41 - 60
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
On the same day as Laster’s ruling in the Aeroflex Holding case, Vice Chancellor John Noble withheld his approval of a shareholder settlement in a merger objection lawsuit arising from Roche’s $8.3 billion acquisition of InterMune. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The same regulatory facts supported a preemption holding barring a Motrin-related claim in Robinson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:15 am
They do not like change and hesitate to expose their clients to the uncertain risks of an ADR process of which they have limited awareness. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:42 am
” Hoffmann–La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
Roche, 614 F.2d 6, 7–8 (1st Cir.1980) (warrant’s limitation of search to “fruits and instrumentalities of the violation” of federal mail fraud statute was inadequate because “limitation by so broad a statute is no limitation at all. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Roche Laboratories, Division of Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 684 P.2d 1187, 1189 (N.M. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 8:20 am
North Carolina: “McCrory misstated Duke Energy holdings, sold stock after coal-ash spill” by J. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:48 pm
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:44 am
See Hoffmann–La Roche, 493 U.S. at 171, 110 S.Ct. at 486–87; see also Kleiner, 751 F.2d at 1203 (class action). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Apotex Inc., No. 2013-1128, -1161, -1162, -1163, -1164 (April 11, 2014).IssueThe issue in this case is whether it would have been obvious at the time of invention to select a once monthly oral dosing regimen of ibandronate to treat osteoporosis and to set that dose at 150 mg [based on prior art references teaching a daily dosage amount].Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. at *9 (text added).Holding[T]he prior art pointed to a monthly treatment of 150 mg of ibandronate. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Supp. 1024, 1033 (D.N.J. 1988).The Kansas Supreme Court later expressly adopted the Spychala holding as part and parcel of the learned intermediary rule:[W]e adopt the ruling of Spychala and other similar cases. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm
In enacting the Tennessee Product Liability Act, “[t]he legislature considered the limitation of future liability to a reasonable and specific period to be one of the most important keys in solving the perceived products liability crisis. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
Hoffman-LA Roche Ltd., 580 F.3d 1340, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
"Congratulations to Fort Collins for continuing to demonstrate excellence in safe driving," said Mike Roche, senior vice president of claims, Allstate. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
In smaller cities and suburban areas: Watch the speed limit. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
The main theory that the plaintiffs were able to come up with involved that last-refuge-of-a-scoundrel Restatement section, §324A “Good Samaritan” liability, that would have: (1) required publishers to investigate the substantive validity of everything they publish (the Philadelphia case involved clinical trials), and (2) would have placed anyone who published anything about a drug, no matter how limited, under a duty to research and publish everything. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:10 pm
Roche Partner O’Rielly & Roche LLP dena@oriellyroche.com [read post]
