Search for: "Ronald Stephens"
Results 41 - 60
of 661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Stephen Brotzman 18. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 7:24 am
” According to the letter, Grassley has requested this event from every president since Ronald Raegan. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
William Casto’s article The Early Supreme Court Justices’ Most Significant Opinion was cited in the following article: Ronald A. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
We would be ignoring, to start, the fundamental contributions of Ronald Coase in “The Nature of the Firm. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
In this vein, Ronald Dworkin has argued that the Learned Hand formula can be understood as reflecting the moral equality of persons. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 1:21 pm
Dave currently co-chairs the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in the 3M earplug litigation, and recently served as trial counsel for veterans Ronald Sloan and William Wayman in a bellwether trial in that MDL that resulted in a $110 million verdict for the plaintiffs. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
To be sure, some scholars these days (especially William Baude and Stephen Sachs) contend that originalism broadly understood is already the law. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
To be sure, some scholars these days (especially William Baude and Stephen Sachs) contend that originalism broadly understood is already the law. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onFederation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
Another of the 33 cases was the New Jersey case brought by Stephen Lanzo, for whom Moline testified as an expert witness.[13] In the course of the Lanzo case, the defense developed facts of Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Schneider shared an episode of the Idea Machines podcast in which Ben Reinhardt sat down with Stephen Dean to discuss how government-funded science can fail American society: And Swain shared a call for listener questions for Lawfare’s annual “Ask Us Anything” podcast episode. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:03 pm
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
But it is at this point that I want to veer in a “meta direction,” away from any specific analysis of Fleming’s particular argument, built in some ways on the insights of Ronald Dworkin but far better developed, precisely because of its careful attention to actual cases, than anything ever written by Dworkin. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm
Stable, transparent, not very complicated, reasonably profitable, and often quite collegial. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:28 am
” Remarkably enough, it was only in 1985, under Ronald Reagan, that the first leaker was actually convicted under the act and sent to prison: Samuel L. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Statistician 129, 131 (2016). [2] Sander Greenland, Stephen J. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
In 1978, the American Law Institute (ALI) authorized a project originally intended to result in a Restatement of corporate law.[1] The drafters intended their project to be a departure from traditional restatements.[2] As they visualized it, the project was to offer “a combination of classic Restatement, forward looking guidelines, and perhaps also model provisions. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Sot Barber, Stephen Macedo, and Jim Fleming argue, “positive constitutionalism is neither new nor inconsistent with American traditions” and properly moves from thinking not only about “negative liberties” but also about positive ends. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1994-95, I was a research fellow at Princeton University’s Center for Human Values and witnessed the now famous exchange between Ronald Dworkin and Justice Antonin Scalia on constitutional interpretation. [read post]
