Search for: "Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 4:39 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Paying for Dropped Calls Every Month: Thank the Supreme Court and its 2010 Term - Washington, DC lawyer Steven Berk on his blog, The Corporate Observer UPDATE: Apple v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:19 am by Emma Durand-Wood
The firm also issued a tax alert on the recent landmark trust residence decision in Fundy Settlement v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:52 am by Steve Matthews
David Silman, an injury lawyer with the Fraser Valley’s Waterstone Law Group, took issue with the recently upheld decision of Hussack v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That the Kleins may do something in the future is not sufficient to state actual damages nor does it show that plaintiff was negligent (Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261, 261, 744 NYS2d 664 (Mem) [1st Dept 2002] [finding that pending foreclosure actions meant plaintiffs had not yet sustained any actual damages]). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 5:46 am by Terry Hart
Choice of Law and Copyright Ownership — Pamela Chestak of Property, Intangible takes a look at the recent decision in RCTV Int’l v Rosenfeld, concerning ownership of the copyright in the Venezuelan telenovela, Juana La Virgen (a US version of the show, Jane the Virgin, airs on the CW). [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Services, LLP v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman LLP, 110 AD3d 426, 427 [1st Dept 2013]; Parametric Capital Mgt., LLC v Lacher, 15 AD3d 301, 302 [1st Dept 2005]; Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:39 pm
Kraft in his Immigration Law Answers Blog Louisiana Supreme Court's rehearing of Borel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Some Questions to Ask Yourself - Columbus lawyer Teri Rasmussen of Plunkett Cooney in her Ohio Practical Business Law Blog Willow Bend v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by Rick Pildes
”Judge Calabresi used this epigram to launch into an opinion which argued that the Supreme Court should overrule Buckley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:01 am
Mangini of Stark & Stark in the firm's New Jersey Law Blog Court reduces $25 million verdict against hospital, denies motion for new trial - Charleston lawyer Jeffrey V. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
- Chicago attorney Jonathan Rosenfeld on Strellis & Field's Chicago Nursing Home Lawyer Blog Jones Day v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:37 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Krupski v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As the Underlying Actions are ongoing, any assessment of damages arising from the Bailey Defendants’ representation would be purely speculative (see Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261 [1st Dept 2002] [malpractice action dismissed where underlying action remained pending]). [read post]