Search for: "Rubio v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 9:45 am by fjhinojosa
Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence V. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
  Businesses with greater than 500 employees and businesses for which the SBA Size Standards are stated in terms of annual receipts (without regard for the number of employee), may be eligible for a PPP loan if they qualify as a “small business concern” under existing law. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This issue is discussed in the 2019, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, opinion styled, Osiel Rubio v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Rubio’s approach is possible; the Senate could vote on the House articles without any additional information. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
” Thing is, cooks and chefs aren’t licensed [same] Meanwhile, in Congress: “Bipartisan Bill Would Stop States From Denying Occupational Licenses Due to Student Loan Debt” [Boehm again on Rubio-Warren measure] “Judicial Sanity on Occupational Licensing and the First Amendment” [Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Fifth Circuit decision in Express Oil Change v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
The complaint argues that the NDAA deprives Huawei of the liberty to sell to federal agencies, as well as by stigmatizing it and “discouraging other entities across the United States from doing business with Huawei. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Scott Bomboy
(The second Article V option, which allows the states to propose and ratify amendments, is a bigger long shot, as it has never been successfully called.) [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]