Search for: "Ryan v. Department of Justice"
Results 41 - 60
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Another unusual aspect of this case was the fact that the Department of Justice, represented by the Acting Solicitor General, filed an amicus brief and presented oral arguments. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
In its landmark 1963 decision Gideon v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:00 pm
When Ryan later filed suit in Erie County Supreme Court, he sued Estes claiming that the company had allowed the dangerous condition to exist on its property.When Estes sought to have so much of the case that had been brought against it dismissed -- claiming it was an “out-of-possession” landlord that had only limited responsibility for the structure’s maintenance -- a Erie County justice ultimately denied that request.On an appeal, the Appellate Division, Fourth… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am
Hansen, Associate Professor and Department Head, Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia; member of Legal Advisory staff, International Committee of the Red Cross, Washington, D.C.; Francesca Jannotti, Political Officer, Office of the Special Representative to the U.N. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
Arguing for the convicted individual, Allen Ryan Alleyne, will be Mary E. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
Reed and Ryan McCoy Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
The ruling in Nebaska v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
Twentyâ€seven states and the Obama Justice Department are involved trying to shield prosecutors from claims for damages from any testimony. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Finally, the Department of Justice admitted yesterday that it inadvertently erred when, during the 2009 arguments in Nken v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:11 am
Ryan and Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:42 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Jurecic and Orpett, in conversation with Wittes, argued that the Justice Department is too narrowly conceptualizing its responsibilities and, as such, is failing to do enough to investigate the Jan. 6 attack. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm
S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm
by Ryan B. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Kingdomware Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
” At Law.com, Marcia Coyle reports that “[t]he Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to stay the injunction to the extent it applies beyond the city of Chicago. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Department of Justice, 800 F. [read post]
